Kolvenbach with JPII
Too bad people don't have more to do.
The Holy Father had a negative report filed by a Jesuit when he was Fr. Bergoglio, and his name was offered as a possible auxiliary to the Archbishop of Buenos Aires in 1992. Traditional bloggists are trolling for the contents to be made public, pointing out:
The report is said to be highly detailed, and to reveal all the character inclinations that are evident in the personality of the current Pope.Fr. Bergoglio was not liked by the Jesuits at the time and was more or less exiled because he was deemed to conservative. That's a fact.
Now, it would be one of the scoops of the century if a journalist revealed to the world this most important historical document. - New Catholic
I'm reminded of the notorious anti-Catholic sede-vacante site, Novus Ordo Watch, the editors of which had a sort of open bounty on Cardinal Mahoney, willing to pay for any damning information on him - such as homosexuality.
This is no different than the anti-clericalist determination to shame and destroy the reputations and vocations of Archbishop Nienstedt and Bishop Finn.
You people have no idea of what spirit is motivating you. If you claim a good spirit you are even more deluded than I thought - you listen to strange locutions and put more faith in counterfeit mystics than the Church.
The devil is our accuser and he has been cast out - in the meantime - realize it is he for whom you work whenever you accuse.
Time to let the light of Christ in - or you'll end up an "Old Catholic".