Britain's leading gay activist calls for lowering of the age of consent.
.
How convenient. The age of consent is there to protect young people from sexual predators, not to restrict young people's freedoms. However, "Peter Tatchell, founder of the group OutRage!, wrote on the website Big Think, 'Whether we like it or not, many teenagers have their first sexual experience around the ages of 14 or 15. If we want to protect young people, and I do, the best way to do this is not by threatening them with arrest, but by giving them frank, high quality sex and relationship education from an early age.'"
.
Huh? Have there been mass arrests of teens in the UK for engaging in sex? Are British jails teeming with horny teenagers? I don't think so. What a screwed up argument Tatchell presents here. Like I said - age of consent laws are there to protect kids from predators and sex-ploitation by adults - it's the adults who get arrested in sex with a minor cases.
.
This is one more piece of evidence from a homosexual activist that gay men, homosexual men, sometimes prefer chicken. And yet they like to claim sexual abuse of children is always a pedophilia problem - and never homosexual... and that the Catholic Church is an institutional predator unwilling to protect children.
.
How freaking queer.
.
Tatchell's OutRage! has long lobbied for the lowering of the age of consent in Britain, which was already lowered for homosexual acts from age 21 in 1994 and again in 2000 to 16, after heavy lobbying by homosexualist activists. - LifesiteNews
.
H/T Tancred at Eponymous
.
Photo: Boys Beware, 1961. Film released through Sid Davis Productions. It deals with a perceived danger to young boys: that of predatory homosexuals.
Oh boy! (said with irony:<P)!
ReplyDeleteAfter reflection, I hope this did NOT sound affirming of this horrid business; I was just being "stupid"...
ReplyDeleteI think it is, as you say Terry, complete hypocrisy for the "gay agenda" to be working for the lowering of the age of consent when they're ready to crucify each and every Catholic priest that is either accused or guilty of it.
Shame on them!
hide yer kidz, hide yer wives...AND hide yer husbundz ....
ReplyDeleteDB - only if they are under the age of consent. LOL! That's what I'm talking about here. Did I ever tell you before that all the pervs who molested me were homos? So if I were a parent in the UK I would be very upset about reducing the age of consent.
ReplyDeleteThe "age of consent" thing raises its ugly head every few years here in Utah..only it has to do with polygamous men marrying young wives..
ReplyDeleteIt was really getting pushed at the time when the infamous Tom Green paraded his "family" on TV and by single grade school math was discovered that his youngest "wife" had her first baby whenshe was 12...so HOW OLD was she when he started having sex with her???
Yeah....gotta protect the kids from the adults...
Sara
The age of consent in Vatican City State is 14.
ReplyDeleteGood thing, probably.
Thom: ouuuuuoh...
ReplyDeleteNow be careful here;
Not every priest is a pederast;
and not every media report is reliable.
Just sayin'
Now now.. I never said they were. ;)
ReplyDeleteThom: I know; I was just bein' stupid.
ReplyDeleteBut with the new norms of "gravior delicta", any bishop, priest, or deacon who is abusing minors, universally, is gonna get their ass kicked outta the clerical state; and so it should be.
Sexual sin between adults, although grave, and in the case of clerics, doubly so, is one thing;
abusing a minor is an absolute abomination.
And this Brit is an asshole, if you ask me...sorry; delete me, Terry, if you must:<)!