Cover up those girls, Frau Merkel -- they are much too visible, and detract from the elegance of the rest of the outfit. (Maybe she hasn't heard that "less is more"). And I'm not interested in seeing what she's had for breakfast that morning. A fashion faux-pas of the highest order -- send for Stacy and Clinton, STAT!
Please comment with charity and avoid ad hominem attacks. I exercise the right to delete comments I find inappropriate. If you use your real name there is a better chance your comment will stay put.
whoa.
ReplyDeleteahem.
thank goodness for Queen Elizabeth.
Cover up those girls, Frau Merkel -- they are much too visible, and detract from the elegance of the rest of the outfit. (Maybe she hasn't heard that "less is more"). And I'm not interested in seeing what she's had for breakfast that morning. A fashion faux-pas of the highest order -- send for Stacy and Clinton, STAT!
ReplyDeleteWell at least we now can understand why Bush couldn't keep his hands off of her. (Remember the shoulder massage?)
ReplyDeleteI wonder if it would look more acceptable if her face was as smooth as those boobies?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteMeanwhile the French are upset about too much coverage at the beach: the burqini.
ReplyDeleteGeorge Bush would really give her a back rub now! LOL!
Cath - I wouldn't let her in the pool dressed like that either. Come to think of it, I wouldn't have let her in the country. Oh! Is that racist?
ReplyDeleteRemind me again, what race is Islam?
ReplyDeletehttp://i28.tinypic.com/2r3dn9i.jpg
ReplyDeleteWell, a woman can show her decollatage if it's after 6 and her's is impressive for her age. Heck, there impressive for my age.
ReplyDeleteVincenzo's version is much better.
ReplyDelete