Sunday, September 30, 2018

Out of my control ... The Crisis.



What is Truth?

Who is telling it?  I'm not sure these days.  That's the crisis - who to believe?

Kavanaugh or Ford?  Haha.  It's not up to me.

McCarrick or Viganò or the Vatican?  Again.  It's not up to me.  (Don't get me wrong - I believe the Holy Father and support him.  When I reference 'the Vatican' I'm nor specifically referring to the Holy See but rather the so-called Vatican 'spokesmen' and/or those speaking for the Pope, albeit unofficially and off-the-cuff.)

A friend sent me the story on the most recent letter from Viganò.  I started to read it, but stopped.  It's against Pope Francis and unverifiable, so I can't read it.  I have a hard time believing any attack upon the Pope's credibility - especially from anyone as arrogant and as contemptuous as Viganò seems to be.

Crux has a couple of articles on what editors think is going on or not going on.  It's more or less an opinion by journalists, I haven't noticed any bombshell evidence that has been unearthed.  Nor have I come across any documentation as to how McCarrick rose to the top.  We may never know.
An expert on Church law in Rome says there's no precedent for bishops' investigation other bishops, and that only the authority of the pope can release the documents likely needed to get to the bottom of the case of ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick. - Crux
This is pretty much what I have concluded as well. Only the Pope can authorize a visitation and he has so far decided against this. So the McCarrick case is pretty much decided, the Cardinal title has been removed, he's in a Capuchin friary doing penance. The rest is private - obviously. That is because ...
"Puig also noted that most of McCarrick’s misconduct happened with adult priests and seminarians, and while there was certainly an abuse of power at play, there were only two cases of minors who alleged having been abused, meaning the congregation, which deals only with delicta graviora crimes, or “serious offenses,” would not oversee the bulk of McCarrick’s misbehavior, perhaps making the case less urgent than others that could also be waiting for trial." - Crux
It seems to me Cardinal Maradiaga actually revealed how the McCarrick thing is being handled and will be treated: As private matter of a homosexual nature, the rest - his progress through the ranks - is an internal administration concern. McCarrick will die soon and even if the USCCB was able to get into the archives, they would not be able to reveal what they found out.
It's out of my control, and there is nothing I can do about it. If I read the gossip and debates, I risk losing my faith.  I risk seeing the Church as a purely human institution, a social justice organization.

I'm happy the Pope asked for the daily rosary and prayers to St. Michael during October "to protect the Church from the devil, who always seeks to separate us from God and from each other."  What is happening is truly diabolical. 


7 comments:

  1. The Kavanaugh thing has nothing to do with right or wrong. It is truly the politics of personal destruction. I am not taking either side in this, but I think it is pretty apparent that Kavanaugh did some unsavory things when he was young. He was a privileged kid from an affluent family. But he has lived what seems to be an exemplary life since then. That doesn’t matter to the Dems who want him out, and they don’t care if it destroys him and his family. The Republicans would do the same thing to someone they oppose. Politicians are some of the worst humans on the face of the earth.

    As far Viganò attacking Pope Francis. You say you don’t know who is right or wrong. So you think it is possible that Pope Francis is trying to undermine and change Church teaching and that he is as evil as Viganò says he is? If that is the case, Terry, please let me know. I am not going to argue with you about it - our past disagreements have gotten pretty nasty. It is just that sometimes you say you fullly support Pope Francis, and other times, like with this post, you sound like you doubt him. Yours is the only blog that I support in any way, but I guess I want to know if I should just move on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh no - sorry I didn't express it very well at all - no - I think the Pope is solid - he's definitely not lying about anything and I accept his refusal to address these questions. When I wrote who to believe and said 'A friend sent me the story on the most recent letter from Viganò. I started to read it, but stopped. It's against Pope Francis and unverifiable, so I can't read it. I have a hard time believing it.' I meant that. I don't believe how the Pope is being portrayed. Sorry I wasn't more clear. I'll try to fix that. When I do read the Vigano commentaries, I am 'tempted' to doubt the Pope - but that is why I say I can't read that stuff.

      Another effect or dimension of the question of 'who is right or who is wrong' or 'who is telling the truth and who is lying' is the overall atmosphere of deception in media and how ingenious the misrepresentation of truth is. There is an attraction to those who are supposedly telling the truth because one can't imagine reputable persons lying or dissimulating their 'alternative facts'. It is an extreme example of diabolical illusion, which is why I am compelled to stand with the Pope.

      I used the Maradiaga analysis as my basic reasoning as to why we will never know in this life details of what happened. The Church rarely if ever shares that kind of info, because the sin is private, the mechanism which promoted him is corrupt, and that is what this papacy is focused upon eliminating. Many of us would want more details, but it won't happen like that. Many of us don't like Maradiaga and the others - my meaning of 'the Vatican' - but they are part of the curia and we don't have a 'vote' on who the Pope chooses as his advisory board.

      Therefore my conclusion - there is nothing I can do about it and I will pray - fervently - as the Holy Father asks. Sorry if I sound like I'm giving up on the Pope - I'm not.

      Hope that explains things better.

      Delete
  2. I’m kinda confused haha. I get that the idea that these sins are “private” is what is being said by Maradiaga and people like that. But, excuse me - fuck that.

    A bishop who falls and ends up cruising a gay bar for a hookup, gets addicted to porn, whatever - I can buy that is a private failing and a private sin and perhaps even a private encounter with grace.

    But a bishop or priest living a *lifestyle* that facilitates these kinds of sins? Who shows NO signs of remorse or repentance, especially when they’re a bishop who agitated against the teaching of the church? There’s nothing private about that.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Francis I like. The “St. Gallen Group” is a group I have zero respect for as men or as clerics. And Francis is still very close to most of the ones who are still alive. The ones who wail about clericalism but are themselves stonewalling clericalists par excellence. That will never stop being a problem.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Two sayings come to mind: "The Truth will set you free" and "Truth against the World." The second was the family motto of Frank Lloyd Wright. He carved it above his family hearth. I believe both apply here for me. The same with the Kavanaugh and Trump fiasco. Eventually God let's all be revealed. For now I find peace in that thought.

    ReplyDelete
  5. DC Archdiocese Reveals McCarrick Is Living On Doorstep Of STARBUCKS! 15 Minute DRIVE For A PSL!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In the midst of all the craziness, chaotic finger pointing, "I'm right - You're wrong" self-righteousness indignation, we sure could use a good chuckle with a little spiked PSL.

      Make mine extra hot please!

      Delete


Please comment with charity and avoid ad hominem attacks. I exercise the right to delete comments I find inappropriate. If you use your real name there is a better chance your comment will stay put.