If I didn't know you were coming, I would have baked a cake.
Once upon a time there was a baker in a far off land called Oregon, who made beautiful cakes for all occasions. He and his family moved there because the charming little hamlet they settled in had no other bakeries, and the citizens were starving for cake.
One day two old spinsters came to the shop asking the baker to bake them a wedding cake, as neither of them had been married before and the big one, Marge, said to her friend:
"Well let's just pretend then and tie the knot Berty!"
Arriving at the Bake Shop one day, the two old women explained to the baker they wanted a pretty wedding cake with two men on top. You see, Marge and Berty could only fit into big and, ah, short sized menswear, or at least that's what they told the curious ones.
Now the baker and his family were good people who didn't approve of pretend marriages... more specifically, baker didn't believe in gay marriage, which kind of explains why he was against baking a cake for their nuptials. Marge and Bertie were very sad and cried, but they were soon angered as well...
So what did they do? They decided to throw a lawsuit instead of a wedding.
As the old proverb says:
As the baker, so the cake; No baker, no cake... ah, er, or,
You can't have your muffin and eat it too...
The End
So what's it all about Cookie?
It seems these situations have been been happening a lot. I'm told elsewhere a florist was sued for refusing to do the flowers for a gay wedding. A week or so ago I wrote about another florist who refused to send flowers to an atheist.
To be honest, these situations confuse me. If I were running a business and baked cakes or arranged flowers, I'm not sure I would care if I were making or selling these products to good or bad people. Gays or straights. Believers or non believers. Now if there were abortafacients in the frosting, or cyanide gas in the floral spray, I wouldn't do it - in other words, I can see why a pharmacist would not want to sell contraceptives or the morning after pill. I can even see how a Justice of the Peace might have trouble performing a same sex marriage. But baking a cake? If it were my business, it seems I would regard it as a rather neutral act. To each his own.
Other bloggers see the incident(s) quite differently however. From what I understand others believe the women ordering the cake did so just to make an issue of the situation. They knew the baker was a Christian and would refuse to bake the cake. But how did they know that for sure? Just exactly how the other homosexuals knew a Christian florist would figure out that making two bridal bouquets would have to be for a same sex marriage. What?
When is this going to make sense. Bullwinkle?
In conscience they
can not do it - because
they don't believe in same sex marriage. Though uninvited to the wedding, and therefor not even a witness to it - marriages to be legal must be witnessed I think - their consciences would be violated because they made the cake and arranged the flowers. I get that... kinda. But how did the women know the baker would refuse the couple goods and services? I don't know - other people are claiming they did and that they were really just trying to make a federal case out of it... If true...
Why?
I'm glad you asked that, because I think I figured it all out after reading
Fr. Longenecker's post on the approval of same sex marriage in the UK. In his com box, someone mentioned civil rights... Now
we know same sex marriage is not a
real civil right... but it is fast being promoted as such. To make a long post short here, I have laid out the reason for these frivolous law suits against business owners who are conscientious objectors to same sex marriage... Here it is (I left it as a comment on Fr. L's post):
The baby steps of suing bakers and florists and hoteliers for not accommodating same sex weddings is the necessary groundwork needed to make the case for the civil rights claims. Excluding a particular group from goods and services is what happened to blacks in this country, and Jews in Nazi Germany. Lawsuits claiming discrimination based on gender and sexual orientation form the necessary precedent to establish the claim of civil rights violations. Soon, if not already, same sex marriage is popularly regarded as a genuine civil right.
Like I said,
He totally makes this crap up!
I'm against it. Same sex marriage, that is. Although I'd be happy to sell you one of my paintings - no questions asked.
What?